author photo

TY Lives in the Far North, Giving an occasional new perspective.

See All Posts by This Author

Obamas Fundamental Change

Obama’s fundamental change

I find it amazing as B. Hussein Obama speaks of a necessity of fundamental change to our 200 Year Old Government and hope for the future.

As a supposed ‘Constitutional Scholar and Professor’ B. Hussein Obama seems to have missed the three, count them THREE methods that our Brilliant Founders included within the ‘Framework’ of our Constitution to deal with the changes which the future (to Our Founders) might require.

Let me first remind the reader that the basis and fundamental aspects of These United States of America are:

    We are a Representative Republic.


    We have a Constitution duly adapted thru convention and adopted by these United States of America.


Let us begin with The Constitution itself:
Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the process whereby the Constitution may be altered.

Then of course there is:
The 1st Amendment to The Constitution in The Bill of Rights.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;
(we are all familiar with these, But what about the following?)

or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
(This was specifically included as a right to Assemble to convene a new Constitutional Convention. Hillary wants this, at least she is willing to trust The Constitution.)

and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
(as distasteful as it may seem in todays world, this is a right to get together with like minds and ‘lobby’ the government to influence ‘grievances, disagreements with policy’.

None of these methods consider our popularity in Europe, Asia or anywhere else.
Neither do they require an Opinion rendered by The New York Times, Hollywood or Hugo Chavez.

This young Quisling is presented as ‘Constitutional Law Professor’, but he seems to hate The Constitution as written and wishes to alter the Fundamentals of our Nation without using the provisions built into The Constitution.

Like this post? Publish It On Your Own Blog

Post a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Popular

    Most Comments

    Search

    Tags

    Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • It actually goes beyond that. Disabled Veterans who have had any head injuries can also be denied their 2nd Amendment…
      Uplander | 25Mar10 | More
    • I found this also on Michele Malkin’s Blog. Cool, Uplander. http://tinyurl.com/69b5w5
      Mort | 8Jun08 | More
    • As to the 'Separating Families' allegations, Children under 18 should remain with their parents. If the child is a…
      Eino | 27May08 | More
    • The following Pol agrees: “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf…
      LZ | 14Nov07 | More
    • Wouldn't we all be better off if they went home and stayed there. Consider that. Maybe…
      Uplander | 29Oct07 | More
    • 'independently by an office in the United Nations that specializes in...' Whoever wrote that should be a…
      LZ | 24Aug07 | More
    • Tree Tings They're not immigrants, they're criminals by definition. Children of any citizenship belong…
      Uplander | 7Jun07 | More
  • Recent Posts

  • Tags

  • Categories

  • November 2008
    S M T W T F S
    « Oct   Dec »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30